{"id":8522,"date":"2016-07-08T12:34:50","date_gmt":"2016-07-08T16:34:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/geotech.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/a-Shea-Creek-regional-residual-airborne-magnetics-b-Apparent-conductance-derived-B-field-airborne-EM-c-Elevation-slides-of-3D-pole-pole.png"},"modified":"2016-07-08T12:34:50","modified_gmt":"2016-07-08T16:34:50","slug":"a-shea-creek-regional-residual-airborne-magnetics-b-apparent-conductance-derived-b-field-airborne-em-c-elevation-slides-of-3d-pole-pole-2","status":"inherit","type":"attachment","link":"https:\/\/geotech.ca\/ru\/a-shea-creek-regional-residual-airborne-magnetics-b-apparent-conductance-derived-b-field-airborne-em-c-elevation-slides-of-3d-pole-pole-2\/","title":{"rendered":"2 a) Shea Creek regional residual airborne magnetics, b) Apparent conductance derived B field airborne EM, c) Elevation slides of 3D pole-pole resistivity model at -50 masl, and -250 masl, and d) Resistivity cross-sections (note reversed colour-scale relative to ZTEM) for line 80+00 N obtained from (a) Titan 24 RLM TM, (b) TAMT Tipper, (c)TAMT TM, (d) DC resistivity inversion (modified after Nimeck and Koch, 2008)."},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"class_list":["post-8522","attachment","type-attachment","status-inherit","hentry"],"acf":[],"description":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

2 a) Shea Creek regional residual airborne magnetics, b) Apparent conductance derived B field airborne EM, c) Elevation slides of 3D pole-pole resistivity model at -50 masl, and -250 masl, and d) Resistivity cross-sections (note reversed colour-scale relative to ZTEM) for line 80+00 N obtained from (a) Titan 24 RLM TM, (b) TAMT Tipper, (c)TAMT TM, (d) DC resistivity inversion (modified after Nimeck and Koch, 2008).<\/p>\n"},"caption":{"rendered":"

2 a) Shea Creek regional residual airborne magnetics, b) Apparent conductance derived B field airborne EM, c) Elevation slides of 3D pole-pole resistivity model at -50 masl, and -250 masl, and d) Resistivity cross-sections (note reversed colour-scale relative to ZTEM) for line 80+00 N obtained from (a) Titan 24 RLM TM, (b) TAMT Tipper, (c)TAMT TM, (d) DC resistivity inversion (modified after Nimeck and Koch, 2008).<\/p>\n"},"alt_text":"","media_type":"image","mime_type":"image\/png","media_details":{"width":1738,"height":614,"file":"2012\/01\/a-Shea-Creek-regional-residual-airborne-magnetics-b-Apparent-conductance-derived-B-field-airborne-EM-c-Elevation-slides-of-3D-pole-pole.png","sizes":{"thumbnail":{"file":"a-Shea-Creek-regional-residual-airborne-magnetics-b-Apparent-conductance-derived-B-field-airborne-EM-c-Elevation-slides-of-3D-pole-pole-150x150.png","width":150,"height":150,"mime_type":"image\/png","source_url":"https:\/\/geotech.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/a-Shea-Creek-regional-residual-airborne-magnetics-b-Apparent-conductance-derived-B-field-airborne-EM-c-Elevation-slides-of-3D-pole-pole-150x150.png"},"medium":{"file":"a-Shea-Creek-regional-residual-airborne-magnetics-b-Apparent-conductance-derived-B-field-airborne-EM-c-Elevation-slides-of-3D-pole-pole-300x106.png","width":300,"height":106,"mime_type":"image\/png","source_url":"https:\/\/geotech.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/a-Shea-Creek-regional-residual-airborne-magnetics-b-Apparent-conductance-derived-B-field-airborne-EM-c-Elevation-slides-of-3D-pole-pole-300x106.png"},"large":{"file":"a-Shea-Creek-regional-residual-airborne-magnetics-b-Apparent-conductance-derived-B-field-airborne-EM-c-Elevation-slides-of-3D-pole-pole-1024x362.png","width":1024,"height":362,"mime_type":"image\/png","source_url":"https:\/\/geotech.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/a-Shea-Creek-regional-residual-airborne-magnetics-b-Apparent-conductance-derived-B-field-airborne-EM-c-Elevation-slides-of-3D-pole-pole-1024x362.png"},"album-thumb":{"file":"a-Shea-Creek-regional-residual-airborne-magnetics-b-Apparent-conductance-derived-B-field-airborne-EM-c-Elevation-slides-of-3D-pole-pole-722x406.png","width":722,"height":406,"mime_type":"image\/png","source_url":"https:\/\/geotech.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/a-Shea-Creek-regional-residual-airborne-magnetics-b-Apparent-conductance-derived-B-field-airborne-EM-c-Elevation-slides-of-3D-pole-pole-722x406.png"},"full":{"file":"a-Shea-Creek-regional-residual-airborne-magnetics-b-Apparent-conductance-derived-B-field-airborne-EM-c-Elevation-slides-of-3D-pole-pole.png","width":1738,"height":614,"mime_type":"image\/png","source_url":"https:\/\/geotech.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/a-Shea-Creek-regional-residual-airborne-magnetics-b-Apparent-conductance-derived-B-field-airborne-EM-c-Elevation-slides-of-3D-pole-pole.png"}},"image_meta":{"aperture":0,"credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":0,"copyright":"","focal_length":0,"iso":0,"shutter_speed":0,"title":"","orientation":0}},"post":null,"source_url":"https:\/\/geotech.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/a-Shea-Creek-regional-residual-airborne-magnetics-b-Apparent-conductance-derived-B-field-airborne-EM-c-Elevation-slides-of-3D-pole-pole.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/geotech.ca\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8522","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/geotech.ca\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/geotech.ca\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/attachment"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geotech.ca\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geotech.ca\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8522"}]}}